Glucocorticoid discontinuation rate and risk factors for relapses in a contemporary cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis.

The rates of relapses and therapy discontinuation in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) in the modern therapeutic era have not been defined. We aimed to evaluate the glucocorticoid (GC) discontinuation rate and the factors associated with relapses in a contemporary GCA cohort. Patient and treatment data were collected cross-sectionally at first evaluation and 2 years later (second evaluation), in a multicenter, prospective GCA cohort. Predictors of relapses were identified by logistic regression analyses. 243 patients with GCA were initially included (67% women, mean age at diagnosis: 72.1 years, median disease duration: 2 years) while 2 years later complete data for 160 patients were available and analyzed. All patients had received GCs at diagnosis (mean daily prednisolone dose: 40 mg) while during follow-up, 37% received non-biologic and 16% biologic agents, respectively. At second evaluation, 72% of patients were still on therapy (GCs: 58% and/or GC-sparing agents: 29%). Relapses occurred in 27% of patients during follow-up; by multivariable logistic regression analysis, large vessel involvement at diagnosis [odds ratio (OR) = 4.22], a cardiovascular event during follow-up (OR = 4.60) and a higher initial GC daily dose (OR = 1.04), were associated with these relapses. In this large, real-life, contemporary GCA cohort, the rates of GC discontinuation and relapses were 40% and 27%, respectively. Large vessel involvement, a higher GC dose at diagnosis and new cardiovascular events during follow-up were associated with relapses.

Septic Arthritis Complicating a Gout Flare: Report of Two Cases and Review of the Literature.

Objective: To highlight potential pitfalls in diagnosis and management of patients with concomitant gout and septic arthritis. Methods: Presentation of two patients with concomitant gout and septic arthritis, the latter caused by Streptococcus agalactiae and Staphylococcus aureus, in one patient each. We also reviewed the English language literature on PubMed for similar cases. Results: Data on concurrent gout and septic arthritis is limited. Three case series of 14, 25, and 30 patients each where identified. The coexistence of septic arthritis and gout is an infrequent condition. Clinical appearance of the two diseases may be very similar and the presence of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals per se cannot exclude infection. On the other hand, patients with chronic tophaceous gout are prone to infection of MSU tophi and the development of biofilms on the latter may render the eradication of microbes particularly difficult. Vice versa, persistent activation of the immune system fuelled by the infection, together with prolonged hospitalisation and immobilisation, may increase the risk for a gout flare, thus initiating a vicious cycle. Conclusion: In patients with gout, a high index of suspicion for infection is needed by treating physicians, because septic arthritis is a medical emergency which can lead to rapid joint destruction.

Patterns and factors associated with pneumococcal vaccination in a prospective cohort of 1,697 patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Introduction: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk for serious infections. Pneumococcal vaccination is among the most important preventive measures, however, vaccine uptake is suboptimal. We explored the rate and factors associated with pneumococcal vaccination in a contemporary RA cohort. Materials and methods: Multi-center, prospective, RA cohort study in Greece. Patient and disease characteristics and influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations were documented at baseline and 3 years later. Results: One thousand six hundred and ninety-seven patients were included and 34.5% had already received at least one pneumococcal vaccine at baseline. Among 1,111 non-vaccinated patients, 40.1% received pneumococcal vaccination during follow-up, increasing the vaccine coverage to 60.8%. By multivariate analysis, positive predictors for pneumococcal vaccination included prescription of influenza vaccine (OR = 33.35, 95% CI: 18.58-59.85), history of cancer (OR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.09-5.06), bDMARD use (OR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.29-2.65), seropositivity (OR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.05-2.05), and high disease activity (DAS28-ESR, OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.17-1.51). Male sex (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.43-0.99) was a negative predictor for pneumococcal vaccination during follow-up. Discussion: Despite increasing rates of pneumococcal vaccine coverage, 40% of RA patients remain unvaccinated. Severe disease, bDMARD use, comorbidities, and more importantly flu vaccination were the most significant factors associated with pneumococcal vaccination, emphasizing the currently unmet need for cultivating a "vaccination culture" in RA patients.

An international audit of the management of dyslipidaemia and hypertension in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from 19 countries.

AIMS: To assess differences in estimated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients from different world regions and to evaluate the management and goal attainment of lipids and blood pressure (BP). METHODS AND RESULTS: The survey of CVD risk factors in patients with RA was conducted in 14 503 patients from 19 countries during 2014-19. The treatment goal for BP was <140/90 mmHg. CVD risk prediction and lipid goals were according to the 2016 European guidelines. Overall, 21% had a very high estimated risk of CVD, ranging from 5% in Mexico, 15% in Asia, 19% in Northern Europe, to 31% in Central and Eastern Europe and 30% in North America. Of the 52% with indication for lipid-lowering treatment (LLT), 44% were using LLT. The lipid goal attainment was 45% and 18% in the high and very high risk groups, respectively. Use of statins in monotherapy was 24%, while 1% used statins in combination with other LLT. Sixty-two per cent had hypertension and approximately half of these patients were at BP goal. The majority of the patients used antihypertensive treatment in monotherapy (24%), while 10% and 5% as a two- or three-drug combination. CONCLUSION: We revealed considerable geographical differences in estimated CVD risk and preventive treatment. Low goal attainment for LLT was observed, and only half the patients obtained BP goal. Despite a high focus on the increased CVD risk in RA patients over the last decade, there is still substantial potential for improvement in CVD preventive measures.

Diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular risk management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an international audit.

AIM: The objective was to examine the prevalence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and its risk factors among patients with RA with diabetes mellitus (RA-DM) and patients with RA without diabetes mellitus (RAwoDM), and to evaluate lipid and blood pressure (BP) goal attainment in RA-DM and RAwoDM in primary and secondary prevention. METHODS: The cohort was derived from the Survey of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis from 53 centres/19 countries/3 continents during 2014-2019. We evaluated the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among RA-DM and RAwoDM. The study population was divided into those with and without ASCVD, and within these groups we compared risk factors and CVD preventive treatment between RA-DM and RAwoDM. RESULTS: The study population comprised of 10 543 patients with RA, of whom 1381 (13%) had DM. ASCVD was present in 26.7% in RA-DM compared with 11.6% RAwoDM (p<0.001). The proportion of patients with a diagnosis of hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and use of lipid-lowering or antihypertensive agents was higher among RA-DM than RAwoDM (p<0.001 for all). The majority of patients with ASCVD did not reach the lipid goal of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <1.8 mmol/L. The lipid goal attainment was statistically and clinically significantly higher in RA-DM compared with RAwoDM both for patients with and without ASCVD. The systolic BP target of <140 mm Hg was reached by the majority of patients, and there were no statistically nor clinically significant differences in attainment of BP targets between RA-DM and RAwoDM. CONCLUSION: CVD preventive medication use and prevalence of ASCVD were higher in RA-DM than in RAwoDM, and lipid goals were also more frequently obtained in RA-DM. Lessons may be learnt from CVD prevention programmes in DM to clinically benefit patients with RA .

Incidence, risk factors and validation of the RABBIT score for serious infections in a cohort of 1557 patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Predicting serious infections (SI) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is crucial for the implementation of appropriate preventive measures. Here we aimed to identify risk factors for SI and to validate the RA Observation of Biologic Therapy (RABBIT) risk score in real-life settings. METHODS: A multi-centre, prospective, RA cohort study in Greece. Demographics, disease characteristics, treatments and comorbidities were documented at first evaluation and one year later. The incidence of SI was recorded and compared with the expected SI rate using the RABBIT risk score. RESULTS: A total of 1557 RA patients were included. During follow-up, 38 SI were recorded [incidence rate ratio (IRR): 2.3/100 patient-years]. Patients who developed SI had longer disease duration, higher HAQ at first evaluation and were more likely to have a history of previous SI, chronic lung disease, cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease. By multivariate analysis, longer disease duration (IRR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.005, 1.1), history of previous SI (IRR: 4.15; 95% CI: 1.7, 10.1), diabetes (IRR: 2.55; 95% CI: 1.06, 6.14), chronic lung disease (IRR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.35, 7.27) and daily prednisolone dose ≥10 mg (IRR: 4.77; 95% CI: 1.47, 15.5) were independent risk factors for SI. Using the RABBIT risk score in 1359 patients, the expected SI incidence rate was 1.71/100 patient-years, not different from the observed (1.91/100 patient-years; P = 0.97). CONCLUSION: In this large real-life, prospective study of RA patients, the incidence of SI was 2.3/100 patient-years. Longer disease duration, history of previous SI, comorbidities and high glucocorticoid dose were independently associated with SI. The RABBIT score accurately predicted SI in our cohort.

Real Life Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab in Biologic-Experienced Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis.

Background: Real world evidence data regarding secukinumab (SEC) use in biologic-experienced patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are scarce. Objectives: To assess the real life survival, safety and efficacy of SEC in biologic-experienced patients with PsA. Methods: All biologic-experienced PsA patients treated with SEC in 2 University Rheumatology Units were included (3/2016-12/2018). Patients' and disease characteristics were recorded at baseline and during SEC therapy. Results: 75 patients were included; 76% were females with a mean age of 53.9 years, median disease duration of 6.7 years and median SEC treatment duration of 11.1 months. At baseline, 97% had peripheral arthritis, 42% axial involvement, 22% enthesitis, and 12% dactylitis. Regarding previous biologic exposure, 48 (64%) had been exposed to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents only, 5 (7%) to the interleukin (IL)-12/23 inhibitor (Ustekinumab-UST) only while 22 (29%) both to anti-TNFs and UST. Fifty-three percent received SEC in combination with non-biologics and 35% with glucocorticoids, respectively. During follow-up, statistically significant improvement in different disease activity indices were noted (DAS28-CRP, DAPSA, BASDAI). SEC survival rate at the end of follow-up was 64% (48/75), without difference between patients exposed to anti-TNFs only (67%) vs. anti-TNFs and UST (68%) as well as to 1 vs. ≥2 anti-TNFs. The rate of serious adverse events and serious infections during follow-up was 4.8 and 1.2/100 patient-years, respectively. Discussion: In real life, in biologic-experienced patients with PsA, SEC displayed a high retention rate, regardless of the type, and number of previous biologics (anti-TNFs ± anti-IL12/23), without significant side effects.

Periaortitis and diffuse subendocardial vasculitis in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus - Lupus flare or a coexisting disease?

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous disease with a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations. Periaortitis is a rare disorder which may manifest isolated or in association with other autoimmune diseases, including SLE. Another rare, yet severe cardiovascular manifestation of lupus is diffuse subendocardial vasculitis (DSV), which should be suspected in patients presenting with myocardial hypokinesis, impaired ejection fraction and normal coronary angiography. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) imaging is crucial to distinguish between DSV and lupus myocarditis, which should also be included in the differential diagnosis. Herein, we describe a case of a female patient with pre-existing SLE, who presented with both periaortitis and DSV, and discuss the diagnostic challenges associated with these rare manifestations.

Conversion and Reversion Rates of Tuberculosis Screening Assays in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases and Negative Baseline Screening Under Long-Term Biologic Treatment.

BACKGROUND: To determine the conversion and reversion rates of tuberculosis (TB) screening tests (Tuberculin Skin Test-TST, Interferon Gamma Release Assay-IGRA: T-SPOT.TB) during biologic treatment in patients with rheumatic diseases and negative baseline screening. METHODS: This was a long-term, longitudinal cohort study of 50 patients with rheumatic diseases and negative baseline TB screening (TST: < 5 mm, negative T-SPOT.TB) treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) or other non-TNFi biologics. Patients were rescreened at a mean time of 1.4 (first rescreening) and 6.9 (second rescreening) years from baseline, with both assays. The conversion (negative to positive) and reversion (positive to negative) rate was calculated for each TB screening test. RESULTS: Fifty patients (mean age = 60 years) with various rheumatic diseases (rheumatoid arthritis: n = 24, spondyloarthropathies: n = 23, other: n = 3) were enrolled. During the first phase (baseline to first rescreening), all patients were treated with TNFi while during the second phase (first to second rescreening), TNFi (54%) and non-TNFi (46%) were used. Fifteen patients (30%) displayed conversion of at least 1 screening assay during follow-up (10 at the first and 5 at the second rescreening). This conversion rate was higher with TST (n = 11, 22% or 3.47/100 patient-years) compared to T-SPOT.TB (n = 4, 8% or 1.74/100 patient-years). Among the 10 converters at the first rescreening, 5 received isoniazid (INH) preventive therapy and 5 did not; an equal number of patients (3/5, 60%) reverted to negative with or without INH therapy. None of the patients developed active TB during follow-up (6.9 ± 1.0 years). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-third of patients with rheumatic diseases and negative baseline TB screening developed conversion of at least 1 screening test during long-term biologic treatment. This occurred most often with TST and was usually a transient event. These findings do not support routine serial TB retesting in biologic-treated patients with rheumatic diseases in the absence of TB risk factors.

Targeted Biologic Therapy for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Emerging Pathways and Drug Pipeline.

Following the approval of belimumab, the first drug to be approved for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in over 50 years, advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease have led to a remarkable number of clinical trials for investigational drugs, each with a unique mechanism of action. These include, but are not limited to, antibodies targeting B or T cells or their interaction, dendritic cells, interferon, and other cytokines. Frustratingly, this boost of studies has not been accompanied by a corresponding success and subsequent approval of novel agents, for reasons only partly attributed to the efficacy of the drugs per se. Successful phase II trials are often followed by failed phase III studies, which typically require many more patients. Nevertheless, recent successes, such as the ustekinumab and baricitinib trials and the positive results from the phase III TULIP-2 study of anifrolumab, provide room for cautious optimism. In this review, we attempt to draw the current landscape of the drug pipeline in SLE, focusing on the rationale behind each drug development, its mechanism of action, and the available preclinical and clinical data. We also highlight lessons learned from failed attempts that have helped to optimize clinical trial design for this challenging disease. We conclude with a look into the future, commenting on the surge of studies in the field of biomarkers and the use of omics technologies in lupus, which aim to pinpoint different disease phenotypes and, ideally, identify subsets of patients with disease that will respond to different biologic drugs.